For your central Jersey real estate needs: JudyNJHomes.com
Insider Download, 10MB: http://www.sendspace.com/file/llab5i Streaming: http://www.gofish.com/player.gfp?gfid=30-1193849 Snapshots: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i64/khm3...snapshot1-1.jpg http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i64/khm3...snapshot2-1.jpg http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i64/khm3...r_snapshot3.jpg Extra Download, 10MB: http://www.sendspace.com/file/k9qqmj Streaming: http://www.gofish.com/player.gfp?gfid=30-1193869 Snapshots: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i64/khm3...a_snapshot1.jpg http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i64/khm3...a_snapshot2.jpg http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i64/khm3...a_snapshot3.jpg
Great find Mark! Katharine sang my fav, "Unforgettable" and Kellie was a bridesmaid. What a happy occasion. Can't wait to see People's pics of the wedding of the year!!!!
E! News, 20080206 www.divshare.com/download/3725358-322 Daily 10, #6, 20080206 www.divshare.com/download/3725221-155
Mr./Ms. Tune is only stating an opinion. I choose to say nothing except that I'm happy that Katharine is happy.
I find this thread and all others about Kat and Nick's wedding to be intrusive to their privacy. I know I could just ignore the thread (s), but I feel like it's out of control. Some here are no better than the media personnel hounding them while they should be enjoying this special time privately. I have lost a lot of respect for this site because of all of this wedding crap. Leave them alone already! Sorry if I've offended anyone, but I feel very strongly about this issue. Just because a person chooses to make music and movies, doesn't give "fans" the right to butt into their private life.
OK... I stand corrected about the wedding stuff. It's mainly the honeymoon pics I have a major problem with. If Kat and Nick invited a professional crew in to capture the wedding or made some arrangement with People, that's OK. But the non-commissioned photos are another story altogether.
I'm sorry, you were making a pretty good case for yourself until the last part. That is like saying you cannot be faulted for buying a telescope for spying on your neighbors! There is no excuse for invasion of privacy, whether it be a private citizen or a celebrity. You may be able to justify it in your mind, but I can't. I thought there was a rule here at KMF that none of that type of photograph be posted?
I believe there has been some relaxing of the rules on that point, but I don't think I'll be importing anything, not because I have a problem, necessarily, but because I don't want to have to decide whether something is okay or not.
If you see post counts of zero, it means that person has unregistered themselves at KMF.
Mr Tune is a reincarnation of beret7, who once again unregistered himself after starting trouble. He *is* a true Kat fan, but has a bit of trouble being civil at times.
What's out of control is the supposed fans that frequent a forum that basically supports invasion of privacy. This forum has gone to the dogs. Nothing but scandalous material. Kat deserves better than this.... I'm outta here for good....
I'm sorry you feel this way GB. While I agree with you in principle, I have come to accept this as a "necessary evil", and of course, so have Kat and Nick themselves, as evident in their invitation to People magazine to provide exclusive wedding coverage. The fact is that fans are interested, and if I don't allow them to satisfy their curiousity here, they'll just go elsewhere to view photos and hold discussions.
But don't worry, I do draw the line somewhere. And that somewhere, to remind everyone, is unflattering, indecent, or otherwise objectionable candid shots, or other photos where Kat and/or Nick are obviously disturbed or uncomfortable with the photog's presence.
Katharine McPhee fans around the world